Applications
Vulnerability Assessment & Penetration Testing
Find the weaknesses. Validate the impact. Give your team a clear way forward.
Explore scopeApplications / 2 of 32
Web Application Penetration Testing.
Test the journeys your users take—and the boundaries they should not cross.
Customer portals, internal applications and SaaS products carry different roles and business rules. Testing follows those workflows rather than stopping at a list of scanner alerts. Coverage is mapped to the application’s features, authentication model and sensitive operations.
A clear scope makes the differenceWhat the work
What the work
can cover.
Explore the areas that can shape this engagement. Final coverage follows your systems, priorities and access.
01 / Inside the scope
Authentication
Review login, password recovery and multi-factor flows. Check whether account state and recovery steps preserve the intended identity checks.
02 / Inside the scope
Authorisation
Compare what ordinary, privileged and separate-tenant users can reach. Validate ownership and role checks on sensitive objects and actions.
03 / Inside the scope
Session lifecycle
Inspect session creation, renewal, logout and invalidation. Review cookies and token handling in the context of the actual application workflow.
04 / Inside the scope
Input and file handling
Assess how the application accepts, stores and displays input. Include upload controls, injection risks and server-side processing where relevant.
05 / Inside the scope
Business logic
Trace approvals, order changes and state transitions. Check whether sensitive steps can be skipped, repeated or performed under an inappropriate role.
06 / Inside the scope
Deployment exposure
Review application-facing configuration, debug information, administrative routes and transport settings. Connect exposure to practical remediation for the hosting team.
01 / 06
What your team receivesFrom evidence
From evidence
to owned action.
A useful result explains coverage, impact and next steps. The agreed proposal makes the deliverables clear.
- 01
Feature and role coverage matrix
- 02
Validated findings and annotated evidence
- 03
Developer-focused remediation guidance
- 04
Retest summary for the selected release
Before the assessmentA useful
A useful
starting point.
These inputs establish the effort, coverage, intended use and timing.
- Application URL and test environment
- At least two users where role comparisons apply
- Critical journeys and known integration limits
Common questions
What defines the scope?
The systems, business objective and evidence you need determine the scope. The assets, access, deliverables and timetable are agreed before work begins.
What will our team receive?
A clear account of coverage, evidence-backed observations and prioritised next actions. The proposal sets out the exact deliverables and any follow-up review.
Can this fit an upcoming release or audit?
Share the milestone and the systems involved. The assessment can be shaped around that decision once technical fit and availability are confirmed.
Connected priorities
You may also need.
Applications
API Security Testing
Follow the request. Check the identity. Protect the object behind it.
Explore scopeApplications
Mobile Application Security Testing
Look beyond the screen: device storage, platform behaviour and the API behind the app.
Explore scope